|
|
发表于 2008-8-6 20:10
|
显示全部楼层
来自: 中国浙江杭州
紫萼铁线莲 是黄花铁线莲的一个变种
http://www.cvh.org.cn/moshi/details.asp?RecordNo=16&mode=1
| 中文名 | 紫萼铁线莲 | | 科名 | Ranunculaceae | | 属名 | Clematis | | 种加词 | intricata | | 种下名称 | var.purpurea | | 作者 | | | 发表刊物 | Fl. Intramongolica 2: 369.pl. 125: 11. 1978 | | 采集基本信息 | China: Nei Mongol: Daqing Mountain (大青山), 6 Sep. 1964 | | 采集人和采集号 | Y.C. Ma (马毓泉) 28 | | 存放标本馆 | T: NMU |
更详细的信息来源于:植 物 分 类 学 报 44 (4): 401–436(2006)
http://www.plantsystematics.com/qikan/manage/wenzhang/f05-0049.pdf
3. Clematis intricata Bunge in Mém. Sav. Etrang. Acad. Sci. St.-Petersb. 2: 75. 1833; Maxim., Prim. Fl. Amur. Suppl. 1. 1858; Kom. in Acta Hort. Petrop. 22: 288. 1903; Kitag., Lineam. Fl. Mansh. 217. 1939; Anonymous in Iconogr. Corm. Sin. 1: 740, fig. 1480. 1972; Anonymous in Fl. Tsinling. 1 (2): 290. 1974; Liou et al., Fl. Pl. Herb. Chinae Bor.-Or. 3: 173, pl. 75, fig. 5. 1975; P. P. Ling in Fl. Reip. Pop. Sin. 28: 142, fig. 15. 1980; Grubov, Key Vasc. Pl. Mongol. 112, t. 52, fig. 237. 1982; He, Fl. Beijing, rev. ed., 1: 250. 1984; J. W. Wang in Fl. Hebei. 1: 474. 1986; Grey-Wilson in Kew Bull. 44: 45. 1989; Y. Z. Zhao in Fl. Intramongol., ed. 2, 2: 531. 1990; Y. J. Ling et al. in Fl. Shanxi. 1: 633. 1992; L. H. Zhou in Fl. Qinghai. 1: 346. 1997; M. Johnson, Klematis 337. 1997; Grey-Wilson, Clematis 167, fig. 121. 2000; J. Q. Fu in Fl. Loess Plat. 1: 440. 2000; Brandenb., Meclatis in Clematis 151. 2000, p.p., excl. syn. C. hilariae Koval., C. sarezica Ikonn. etc.; Grabovsk. in Grubov, Pl. As. Centr. 12: 81. 2001; W. T. Wang & Barth. in Fl. China 6: 367. 2001.——C. orientalis L. ssp. thunbergii (Steud.) Kuntze var. intricata (Bunge) Kuntze in Verh. Bot. Ver. Brand. 26: 125. 1885, p.p., excl. pl. Himal.——C. orientalis L. var. intricata (Bunge) Maxim. in Bull. Acad. Sci. St.-Petersb. 22: 210. 1877; et in Mél. Biol. 9: 583. 1877; Forbes & Hemsl. in J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 23: 6. 1886; Maxim., Fl. Tangut. 3. 1889; Enum. Pl. Mongol. 4. 1889; et in Acta Hort. Petrop. 11: 5. 1890. Type: China borealis, 1831, Bunge s.n. (holotype, LE!; isotypes, G!, P!, PE!).
C. orientalis auct. non L.: Franch., Pl. David. 1: 12. 1884.
C. glauca Willd. var. angustifolia auct. non Ledeb.: Rehd. in J. Arn. Arb. 4: 190. 1923; Hand.-Mazz. in Acta Hort. Gotob. 13: 217. 1939; Anonymous in Fl. Beijing 1: 305. 1962.
C. orientalis L. var. aethusaefolia Kozlov in Publ. Mus. Hoangho Paiho Tien Tsin 22: 14. 1933, nom. illegit., non C. aethusaefolia Turcz.
黄花铁线莲
This species consists of three varieties widespread on the Loess plateau and adjacent provinces of China and extending northward to the desert regions of Mongolia.
3c. var. purpurea Y. Z. Zhao in Fl. Intramongol. 2: 242, 369, pl. 125, fig. 11. 1978; P. P. Ling in Fl. Reip. Pop. Sin. 28: 142. 1980; Y. Z. Zhao in Fl. Intramongol., ed. 2, 2: 533. 1990; W. T. Wang & Barth. in Fl. China 6: 367. 2001. Type: China. Nei Mongol (内蒙古): Daqing Shan (大青山), Halaqingou (哈拉沁沟), in Betula forest, 1964-09-06, Y. Q. Ma (马毓泉) 28 (holotype, not seen).
紫萼铁线莲
This variety differs from var. intricata by having lanceolate terminal leaflets and elliptic lateral leaflets, and purple sepals. Fl. Jul.–Sept.
China (SW Nei Mongol). In Betula forests.
An unclear form:
Clematis glauca Willd. var. akebioides (Maxim.) Rehd. & Wils. f. phaeantha Rehd. in J. Arn. Arb. 1: 195. 1920; Hand.-Mazz. in Acta Hort. Gotob. 13: 218. 1939; Rehd., Man. Cult. Trees & Shrubs, ed. 2, 219. 1951; Grey-Wilson in Kew Bull. 44: 46. 1989; et Clematis 167. 2000.——C. glauca Willd. var. phaeantha (Rehd.) Rehd., Man. Cult. Trees & Shrubs 229. 1927.——C. intricata Bunge var. phaeantha (Rehd.) M. Johnson, Klematis 840. 1997, p.p., excl. Hummel 4137. Type: Plant cultivated in Highland Park, Rochester, New York, U.S.A., 1918-09-20, W. L. J. Edson s.n. (holotype, GH!).
This form, described from a cultivated plant, is similar to C. intricata in the lanceolate or linear-lanceolate leaflets and ascending lanceolate sepals, but differs mainly by having “dull violet” (Rehder, 1920, l.c.) sepals. In the protologue, Rehder (1920) pointed out that “of the origin of this form nothing is known to” him. After its publication, forma phaeantha was firstly mentioned by Handel-Mazzetti (1939) in the enumeration of the Chinese species of the Clematis, but with no specimen being cited for this form and its origin not indicated. Grey-Wilson (1989, 2000) reduced C. intricata var. purpurea to the synonymy under forma phaeantha, for which no specimen was cited and the origin was not indicated either. However, the former with lanceolate terminal leaflets and elliptic lateral leaflets is different from the latter. Johnson (1997) reported the occurrence of forma phaeantha in Gansu Province, China. However, the specimen, Hummel 4137, on which his record was based, is in fact C. akebioides, in which the leaflets are oblong, narrowly ovate, or elliptic in outline, and the sepals are yellow in colour. In the two books entitled Meclatis in Clematis by Brandenburg (2000) and An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Clematis by Toomey & Leeds (2001), forma phaeantha was not included. So, this curious cultivar is only known from the one type gathering, and its origin still remains unclear. |
|